Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/05/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]R6 WAS the model before the R6.2 only significant difference is 1/2000th speed. Used R6 run about $1000 - ---------- > From: Five Senses Productions <fls@5senses.com> > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us, leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] R4 v. R6.2 v. R7 > Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 10:34:29 -0700 > >When you say R6, do you mean R6.2? > > >At 05:13 PM 5/14/98 +0000, Mark Kronquist wrote: >>You lose depending on batteries you gain freedo, creativity and the essence >>of life itself...if you don't use 1/2000 very often save a bundle ( be >>thrifty like me) and buy a used R6) Mark >>---------- >>> From: Five Senses Productions <fls@5senses.com> >>> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >>> Subject: [Leica] R4 v. R6.2 v. R7 >>> Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 12:36:57 -0700 >>> >>>I now have an R4 and am considering replacing it with an R6.2 or R7. >>>I only use my R camera with lenses longer than 100mm, namely >>>the 100 APO and the 180/2.8. The only other lenses I would ever get >>>for the R would be the 280 or the 400, and possibly maybe the 19. >>> >>>Which R body would be the best for my needs? I like the 6.2 myself >>>because it is mechanical, but what do I lose with it? >>> >>> >>>Francesco Sanfilippo, >>>Five Senses Productions >>>webmaster@5senses.com >>> >>> >>>http://www.5senses.com/ >>> >> > > >Francesco Sanfilippo, >Five Senses Productions >webmaster@5senses.com > > >http://www.5senses.com/ >