Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/05/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Why not a 35-50-90? (was: Tri-Elmar)
From: "Patrick R. McKee" <photonewsnetwork@ameri-com.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 15:28:42 -0400
 
Hello, Dave
I know that I would certainly welcome such a product, but, a little faster.
Patrick R. McKee
PNN                                   
prm@photonewsnetwork.com

- ----------
> From: Dave Munroe <dmunroe@vcd.hp.com>
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: [Leica] Why not a 35-50-90? (was: Tri-Elmar)
> Date: Thursday, May 14, 1998 2:12 PM
> 
> Would a 35-50-90mm lens be more difficult to make than
> the current Tri-Elmar?  Would it be equally as popular?
> 
> Just curious,
> 
> -Dave