Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/05/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes you can set the Benbo so that the camera is directly over tripod le= gs and over many other things too - but that=B4s not the problem. If you a= ngle the center column and extend it far enough you=B4ll induce vibrations s= o you must be careful. And if you must extend the center column too much - ev= en if straight up - it is not sturdy enough for long teles. But for close = to the ground macro work with moderately heavy camera setup it is the only thing to have, especially on uneven ground. Mine is close to 20 years o= ld so I=B4m used to its quirks - it certainly is not everyone=B4s cup of t= ea so to speak. Raimo - ---------- > From: Jim Brick <jim@brick.org> > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] tripods was RRS QR plate=20 > Date: 13. toukokuuta 1998 17:32 >=20 > At 06:34 AM 5/13/98 -0500, you wrote: > >Which model of the carbon-fiber gitzo are you using??? > >Has anyone out there [seriously] tried any of the benbo tripods ????= ? > >Info would be appreciated, dp > > >=20 > The problem with the Benbo is that the camera IS NOT directly over th= e > legs. On a normal tripod, with the center post all the way down > (collapsed), camera vibrations are at a minimum. The weight is evenly > distributed over the three legs. A weight on the center post also hel= ps > dampen out vibrations. See page 81 of "Galen Rowell's Vision," ISBN > 0-87156-458-0. Now think about how the Benbo is constructed, and wher= e the > camera is sitting in relationship to the actual tripod legs. >=20 > Jim