Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/05/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Martin V. Howard wrote: > How can something that has been used be MINT+ ?!?? I thought the > definition of "mint" was that is appeared as a coin fresh from the mint, > i.e., never used (bascially never touched either). Even if the item *hasn't* been used, it's manifestly nonsense to describe it as mint+, unless it's somehow been 'improved' over the original brand-new condition.