Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/05/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Copy Superiority/lack thereof?
From: "Raimo Korhonen" <raimo.korhonen@pp2.inet.fi>
Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 21:04:40 +0200

Nikon began making its own glass in 1918 - maybe it was this they had in
storage until 1950.

- ----------
> From: Marc James Small <msmall@roanoke.infi.net>
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Copy Superiority/lack thereof?
> Date: 12. toukokuuta 1998 6:30
> 
> At 06:59 AM 5/12/98 +0800, Sean Dooley wrote:
> >I doubt very much whether the Japanese materials were from the same
> source, or
> >that their manufacturing techniques were identical, so I am sure the
optical
> >performance of the lenses was different.  Whether this means better or
> >worse.....well, you know what they say about beauty.
> 
> 
> I understand that, until 1950 or so, the Japanese were using Schott
optical
> glass imported during the War and remaindered from military stocks.  In
> other words, they were using the very same glass which Zeiss had used
> before the War.
> 
> It is a relatively simple matter to look up the formula of a lens in a
> patent and to translate this by checking out the glasses listed in the
> manufacturer's glass catalogue.
> 
> Marc
> 
> 
> msmall@roanoke.infi.net  FAX:  +540/343-7315
> Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir!