Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/05/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] is a finder necessary?
From: Nathan Wajsman <nathan.wajsman@euronet.be>
Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 07:09:41 +0200

Dan,

I have a follow-on question. I am considering the 24 for my M6. I read
somewhere that the M6 meter is not usable with the 21mm lens. Is that also
true for the 24?

Nathan Wajsman
Overijse, Belgium


Dan Cardish wrote:

> At 06:25 PM 10-05-98 -0700, you wrote:
> >Is a finder the only workable option for using a 21 or 24 on the M6?
> >I have the M6HM, and don''t like the idea of a separate finder each time
> >I want to use the wide angle lenses.  Does anyone shoot "sans finder?"
> >
> >Are there any M bodies that have a finder frame wider than 28mm?
> >
> >
> >
> >Francesco Sanfilippo,
>
> Technically, the answer is no.  However, since there is a bit of extra
> coverage builtin to the frames, especially at infinity, you *may* be able
> to approximate the 24mm view with the 28mm frames, in the regular M6.  Not
> possible in the HM version, since the 35mm frame goes right to the edge of
> the field of vision in the HM viewfinder, and it would be difficult to
> guess what is beyond it.
>
> Dan C.