Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/05/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 10:43 PM 02-05-98 -0500, you wrote: >>photographs. To accept such an exception would, in fact, >>amount to accepting that the photographer's right is >>unlimited, provided that the photograph is taken in a public >>place, thereby extending the photographer's freedom at the >>expense of that of others. > >And you miss the point. It's not the photographer's right that would be >protected, but the public's, to be informed. [snip] The public's right to be informed? About what? That this girl was sitting on the street in public? Dan C.