Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/04/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Tom, Thanks for the info. I did check the web site and found a lot of useful stuff there. A new 90 2.8 is indeed a tempting possibility. A 75 1.4 is even more tempting, but also more than twice as expensive... Nathan TEAShea wrote: > << > 2. I have the Summicron 2/35 lens on it. I think that my next lens > purchase will be a 90 mm lens. There seem to be several incarnations of > that one. Any advice on which ones are good and which aren't? > >> > > Welcome to the list. You might consider the present generation 90 2.8. I > find it to be an very fine lens and it is not too expensive. It has a very > good reputation. The 90 2.0 is reputed to be softer at the widest two > apertures and is scheduled to be replaced soon. I do not have one so cannot > verify this. You might look at Erwin's site for more information on the 90 > 2.8. > > www.imx.nl/photosite/leica/leicahome.html > > Tom Shea