Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/04/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]LUGgers, Went to Keeble & Shuchat today to test two new 50/1.4's with 60mm filter size. Shot one roll of Elite 100 on a tripod of various scenes at 1.4, 2.0, 2.8 and 5.6. Results were similar from both lenses. Actually there was a third, and I'll coment briefly on all three. Not intended to be exhaustive (no Erwin Puts here), but thought you'd be interested. The lens I didn't test had a focusing knot in it. Not all that bad really, but Jeff Alford and others at the store agreed it wasn't right. The two lenses I did test had similar characteristics: o Excellent, absolutely superb, contrast even at 1.4 o Moderate light fall-off at 1.4 (less than most Canon lenses I've seen, similar to Nikon) o Some softness at 1.4 - 2.0 (maybe a bit more than I'd hoped for) By the way, one of the lenses also had a small air bubble off to the side. All in all, I was most impressed with the contrast. I have seen better resolution in other lenses at 1.4 (including Nikon and Canon, at their best), but the softness was minimal and not unexpected -- barely visible with a 5x loupe, quite visible with a 15x. I almost bought one of the them, hemmed and hawed, then decided not to. I have been thinking about the R8 now for about a year and decided, instead, to take the plunge. Will shoot a few rolls in the next few days. Feels good, much simpler than the F5 obviously. If anyone has experience with the new R 50/1.4, I'd love to hear about it. Also saw the new 180 APO/Elmarit. It may be optically better than the lens it replaced, but it's bigger, has a plastic hood, and an unwieldy look compared to the sleak, beautifully made lens it replaced IMHO. John McLeod