Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/04/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I was always taught to use an incident meter when shooting transparancy films, especially in even lighting such as bright sunshine or even overcast light. For people who grew up with in-camera meters like myself, it can be a real eye-opener how dead-on accurate and easy incident metering can be in these situations. You just take ONE reading, set your camera, and shoot ;-) away, until the light changes. This works, at least with traditional low-latitude chrome films, because you're essentially metering the highlights and letting the shadows fall where they may (since blocked up highlights look worse than dark shadows on slides, generally speaking). But with negative film, things change. Now you have to start paying more attention to shadow detail. I guess you can use an incident meter for this purpose too, but it seems less natural and more difficult, especially in mixed lighting. Chrome film has such a limited latitude that you have to decide whether to expose the highlights or the shadows -- neg film has more latitude, plus variable development allowing for both detailed shadows and highlights. I guess I have a question for the pros on the list. If you are shooting neg film outside with mixed sun and clouds and you want shadow detail, how do you use your incident meters? Do you simply shade the meter dome with your hand, or put the meter in shade, and take a reading, then shoot away? Is the procedure essentially the same as with chrome film except now you're giving more weight to the shadow exposure, as opposed to the highlight exposure? John McLeod