Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/04/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mr. Gonzales As I posted a reply last evening to YOUR personal attack, which YOU started on last week, late last night, and again last evening, you must have stayed up all night composing this new barrage. You stated: ______________ You wrote ">You have ignored my posts wholesale while you were the one who decided that this was the forum for discussing these specific problems. I've made VERY clear why I didn't feel that a refund was an acceptable resolution. If you would have the maturity to answer without temeritous condescention, and the honesty to deal with my concerns on an equal level as others here fully expect of you,"< _________________ REPLY: When I first heard about these attacks, which I knew nothing about, last week, I responded Monday without using anyone's names, and apologizing to anyone who ever felt that either I, or any of my staff had ever offended them You immediately attacked me again, stated that I had accused you of of saying things about you in that response (with no personalities involved). I replied that you should re- read my reply, since you were putting words in my mouth. which I did NOT say. ____________________ Then you continued: ____________________ >As I said before, there is no good reason, while others go to extreme >lengths in >recommendng you, for me to remain quiet< ____________________ REPLY: WHO IS GOING TO EXTREME MEASURES ? ___________________ >You offered me nothing for my time, my trouble or my satisfaction.< ____________________ REPLY: What time or trouble??? Making a phone call? What is your time worth? Never heard of any firm paying "DAMAGES" and "EMOTIONAL DISTRESS" claims because the customer was not happy (Not even Paula Jones got them). You just send it back for a refund, which you received. Every time you don't get your way, do you go ballistic? ____________________ >You've characterized me as an upstart,< >In short, you've gone beyond the >bounds of decency, while enlisting the bile of minions, to amplify an >already aggressive plan of action derisive of me personally.< ___________________ REPLY: I did NOT refer to you as an "upstart" ( there you go again). In fact, I never even heard of you before all this, nor I have any feelings or anamosity toward you