Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/04/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Is everything okay with 5 Senses Productions? I just read the news and was wondering if it was the same LUG member.. This was on the internet news... "The case, described as a landmark decision by Playboy, was filed in Southern California against Five Senses Productions and its owner, Francesco Sanfilippo. The suit charged Five Senses with using nearly 7, 500 Playboy-owned images without authorization." Five Senses Productions wrote: > I have both an R8 and a M6 0.85 now. I have used an SLR (Nikon and > Leica for 2 years now) and an M6 for a month now. I agree that an SLR > can do certain things that an M camera cannot do......macro, super-tele, > fisheye-superwide, superfast winder, and high-speed flash sync. > I shoot models for a living, and a bit of travel, street, landscape, etc. > on the side. In only a month I have become an M convert! For the type > of work I do with models (candid, outdoors, natural, non-posed, no flash) > the M6 is PERFECT. The $40 Nissin flash I bought for the M6 is good > enough and has worked perfectly. With the 25 to 100 speed films I use, > a 1/50 sync is not a problem at all. I have had no bad results from the M6 > at all. My only wishes are for a small motor winder/rewinder. I don't call > doubling the height of the camera body a good solution. The lenses I have > used are superb. Performance is better than the R cameras because of > the lack of mirror vibration and fewer restrictions in lens design. I can > actually > handhold down to 1/15 and get a beautiful photo....amazing! > I switched from Nikon SLR to Leica SLR in order to improve the quality of > my images by using Leica glass. It worked. I am now moving from Leica > R to Leica M in order to keep the Leica glass, but get even more compact > and portable. It is also working. I have a feeling the M system will be the > optimal system for me and my work. > > At 07:17 PM 3/27/98 -0800, Jim Brick wrote: > >I don't wish to start a war, this is simply my educated and experienced > >Humble Opinion. I use a 4x5 Linhof Field View for the majority of my > >landscapes, My R camera for the rest. My M camera is not in this class. But > >my view and my R cannot do what my M can do. The greatest landscape camera > >available is a view camera. The R camera is closer to the view, by a long > >shot, than the M. I think the bottom line is that the R camera has better > >tools for landscape photography. Yes, a good photographer can do good > >"limited" landscape things with an M camera, but the R camera opens up > >another dimension, that simply cannot be done with an M camera. Perhaps > >adding a Visoflex would help. But even an M plus Viso is outclassed by a > >whole bunch of R lenses (15mm - 800mm, TTL) that produce exquisite > >landscape photographs, assuming the photographer is capable. You can see > >your DOF, see a filter effect, change film without disturbing your tripod > >set-up, composition on a ground glass with a grid (like a 4x5 view) is > >super, PC lenses to extend DOF or straighten that old water tower or red > >bard, all viewable TTL, this list could go on for pages. > > > >Don't get me wrong, as I said, a good photographer can indeed make good > >landscapes with an M camera. But they're limited in scope and tools. But an > >R camera is a whole lot easier, under far better control, and simply in > >another dimension for this type of photography. > > > >Look at the M6 and R8 (or any R) full color brochures side by side. The > >illustrating photographs, for these two types of cameras, basically depicts > >the kind of photography that each camera is best suited for. Street stuff, > >fast moving, candids for the M; landscapes, macro, superwide, and telephoto > >for the R. There, of course, is an overlap, but clearly, the two different > >camera systems are more comfortable in their respective areas of intent. > > > >Jim > > > > Francesco Sanfilippo, > Five Senses Productions > webmaster@5senses.com > > http://www.5senses.com/