Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/03/25[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
At 08:12 AM 3/25/98 -0800, you wrote: > > Would you agree that the 2.8 is sharper at 2.8 than the 2.0 at 2.8? > Is there better microcontrast and resolution? The latest version of the 90 Elmarit is definitely better in all respects (except at f/2). I own and use the 90 Summicron, and love it, and would never get an Elmarit. I shoot a lot at f/2. It's tack sharp wide open. Either way you can't go wrong. But for absolute best image quality, I believe the Elmarit is the better lens. (The latest version that is identical in the M and R systems optically). ========== Eric Welch St. Joseph, MO http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch How do I set my laser printer on stun?