Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/03/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Steve: In the end budget will determine your choice. I have a Mamiya RZ that, as you pointed out, is great in studio but too heavy for field use. For square format I have used the Bronica SQAi and prefer it over any other ( Hasselblad included). 645 is probabely the best bet for extended trips and, in my opinion, Mamiya is a cut above the rest in that format. If portraiture is your primary goal, i would concentrate on the two I have mentioned. But then, a Ford will take you anywhere a Chevy will (please no comment from bemers) Good hunting. Joseph - -----Original Message----- From: Steve Echols <steve@mvillage.com> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Date: Thursday, March 19, 1998 8:35 AM Subject: [Leica] off topic Medium format with character >Posting this here because you guys know lenses. I have a Mamiya RZ system >which works great in the studio. I want another medium format system that >is more portable. For pictures in the bush, and location portraits. My m >Leicas are great, but sometimes I want a larger neg. >>From reading the post here, the keiv 60 would allow the use of zeiss lenses >and there twins, but the mechanics are questionalbe, and the big mirror is >a minus. Mamiya 6 lenses have no character ?? Mamiya tlr are no good?? >Graflex xl is too long gone. Hassie has the lenses and the mirror. The >Mamiya tlr seems like a good balance, but I don't know anything about the >lens character. You can email me if this is not the proper place. >thanks >Steve > > > >