Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/03/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Quality control
From: Alex Brattell <alex@zetetic.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 19:06:51 +0000

I've had my M6 and 50mm Summilux for a few weeks now. I'm enjoying getting
used to it and it's about to get some more serious use (even outside London,
far from the nearest Leica dealer!).
I made an uncharacteristic decision to buy new, on the basis that this is
something I'll only buy once and if I change my mind the depreciation is
comparatively low.
The M6 chrome body #2331xxx seems perfect so far and lovely to use. I've
found a tendency to slightly underexpose, but maybe that's just learning how
the Leica behaves rather than any calibration problem. Will do tests with
handheld meters.
The 50mm Summilux is also wonderful, a beautiful object that gives the clear
negs I'd hoped for - but the built in hood and the filter ring wobble from
side to side - I went back to the dealer who said that this wasn't right and
it should go back to Leica UK on passport warranty when I got back from my
travels.
I also got a new 35mm Summicron-ASPH (from another dealer who offered
interest free credit). When I got it home and examined it under good light I
found a small mark in the front element coating. I don't believe that this
would make any visible difference in use, but began to feel that this lens
was expensive enough and the claims made for it were extravagant enough to
warrant a 'perfect' product. This is after all the basis of trust between a
consumer and maker of high end products. I also wondered what Leica's
tolerance was for its coating finish and if any tiny imperfection could
lessen the lifespan of the coating (this lens will hopefully be with me for
a very long time). I have been back to the dealer who was sympathetic and
awaiting further stocks. (He buys his stuff from Austria as it's cheaper).
When I bought the lens I had already rejected another one with a more
obvious imperfection, with consecutive serial no - must have been a Monday
morning batch. At the moment I feel I should hang out for a replacement.

1 out of 3 is not so hot (admittedly I'm being hypercritical here) -  if
this is just teething problems with hand finished products and the dealers
and maker are sympathetic to this and see me right I have no problem with it
(although I am surprised it should happen in the first place). The real test
will be total reliability over the next few years accompanied by a growing
pleasure in using these fine tools.

Alex Brattell