Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/03/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>I found that the security guards get very annoyed when you start to >photograph public buildings - with or without tripods. I got told by one >guard that it I could not photograph public buildings for security reasons. > I don't know if it was true or not, but I didn't want to argue the point. I've been asked to leave several places in the Chicago area by Security guards, but than again in another case, one offered to take me up on the roof of his building, I declined as there was nothing I wanted from that vantage point. Security is a valid issue in theory, but in practice, people who want to do surveillance of a building are likely to figure out another way to get the shot. I wanted to photograph the county jail in downtown Chicago as it's a interesting visual design, I really wanted a shot from below looking up, but a guard quickly made me leave. But there is a parking deck across the street, and I was able to get some decent shots from there. Incidently, self parking structures are great places to work from in downtown Chicago. Many museums and churches in Peru and Ecuador will no longer let you photograph or take videos inside. It is for security reasons the say, as they have documented evidence of thieves who have taken photos of arts, circulated them around the world art collector market and if and when they get a suitable buyer, break in and steal the work of art. Security in many places isn't all that great to begin with and they are trying to limit damage as much as they can. It's not so they can sell more post cards as none have postcards or books of their specific treasures. I've photographed in the Art Institute of Chicago and in the Smithsonian without any questions, no tripod......... Duane