Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/02/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The M6 "Ein Stuck Leica" (ESL) site links to the current 1.4/35 asph Summilux at <http://www.leica-camera.com/m_system/mobj_d.htm>. In this lens, which ever it may be, both, the front and the rear lens, are more thick in the center than at the edges. This lens looks completely different than the 1.4/35 asph on the (my) M6-ESL. In the 1.4/35 asph Summilux from the M6-ESL both, the front and the rear lens, are more small in the center (several mm) than at the edges. I'm sure, because she's lying in front of me. The aperture ring is curled. And the lens inscript does not allow the complete word "aspeheric", because the engraving of "Ein Stuck Leica" does not leave enough space. If a concave lens is smaller in the center than at the edges, then the M6-ESL's Summilux is the aspheric version with two concave lenses. I didn't know that this lens was rare - since I just know this type. But, I swear to you, she takes great pix :) Alf _______________________________________ At 10:45 19.02.1998 -0500, you wrote: >There are two easy ways to distinguish the two lenses. Instead of 'ASPH', >the word 'aspherical' appears on the front of the first version. The first >version also has a knurled aperture ring along in addition to the focusing >ring. I believe that the newer ASPH version has a smooth aperture ring.