Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/02/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]David, I just went through 120 LUG messages (like any other day). And your's was about one in twenty that didn't waste my time. Thank you. DFeldman@aol.com wrote: > > I am not a professional; I don't even think I qualify as an advanced amateur. > However, I like the M6 just as it is. I shoot mostly B&W, and I do all my own > processing. > > I confess to being a bit abnormal when it comes to price/performance issues - > I am always willing to spend a lot more money to get small improvements in > quality. I find most discussions of Brand X vs. Brand Y boring and irrelevant, > because they try and compare differences that I will never see. I know that I > would have a hard time seeing the difference between a Nikkor 50mm and a Leica > 50mm lens in my pictures. Maybe someday I will make large enough images to > tell the difference, and mentally, I hope that Leica lens are "the best", but > I don't lose sleep over it. > > Why do I spend the extra for Leica equipment? Because I like the way it feels > as I take the picture. The M camera lets you see the whole scene in focus in a > bright viewfinder. You set the exposure, focus, and "click" you have the > picture. Picture taking with the M6 is a very sensual experience - everything > about it screams "this is the way it is supposed to be!" Every so often I take > out my Nikon FM to shoot with, and it never is as fun to use (I don't have any > big tele's). >