Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/02/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mike, I agree. No point in shooting 1000 rolls for one picture or for 10. I think my goal would be to shoot three or four to get one or two, something along that ratio. If I were lucky I might get more useable shots. What will be done when digital is the editor's choice and you need to lug a notebook just to store those 36000 pictures for those 1000 rolls. Mind boggling. Steve PS. I sure wish someone would take on my lens hood question for my Steinheil Culminar. I have not idea which lens hood to seek for it. [snipped] > > Do you really think so? Is it really necessary for a photographer to shoot a >thousand rolls to make a good essay? I always thought this was to make the >editors' jobs easier, not the photographers'. Personally, if I were required to >shoot 1,000 rolls instead of a hundred to get twenty good pictures, I'd >consider it an insult to me. My best essay I did with less than 40 rolls! > > Although I remember something David Hume Kennerly told me in a supermarket >checkout line in Georgetown (I didn't recognize him, but he was holding a copy >of _Newsweek_, pointing to the cover, and telling the clerk how he shot it ><g>): "There is only one difference between professional and amateur >photographers. Professionals shoot more film and use fewer of the pictures." >