Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/01/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] The 0.85: strange new need
From: Lucien_vD <Lucien_vD@compuserve.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 1998 12:47:03 -0500
 
Erwin,

Thnk you very much for you quick reply.

>I noted in an earlier post that ALL M types share the same physical leng=
th
>of 69,25. Many persons give different figures for the physical baselengt=
h
>of several M models (68,5 etc). These figures are not correct.

Erwin,

Do you know how to correct the following table?

Thank you in advance,

Lucien

M3      0,91 X 68,5     =3D 62,3 effective base length    =

MP      0,91 X 68,5     =3D 62,3
M2      0,72 X 68,5     =3D 49,3          =

M4      0,72 X 68,5     =3D 49,3
M5      0,72 X 68,5     =3D 49,3
M4-2    0,72 X 68,5     =3D 49,3
M4-P    0,72 X 69,25    =3D 49,9          =

M6      0,72 X 69,25    =3D 49,9
M6J     0,85 X 68,85    =3D 58,5          =

M6-0,85 0,85 X 69,53    =3D 59,1    =