Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/01/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 10:38 AM 1/29/98 +0100, you wrote: >In message <9801282321.AA15743@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> writes: > > >> >>>Please, one more time, why is the Leica R superior to other SLR >> cameras? Dale<<< > >They're not! >I own both Leica R lenses (2/50, 2.8/35, 2.8/24, 2.8/80-200 and Nikon MF Excuse me, but you mention lenses that aren't in the top of the Leica game, and one that never existed. There is no 80-200 2.8 Leica lens. How old is the 35 2.8? And the 50 Summicron, though it's good, is hardly one of the best, and can't compare to what's come on in the past 15 or so yeras. All of which are vastly superior to Nikon's lineup. ========== Eric Welch St. Joseph, MO http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch We are born naked, wet and hungry. Then things get worse.