Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/01/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ach, the age old question. I assume you are comfortable with you wife. = Why should a camera be different??? You seem to be most comfortable with = the R System. If it were me, I think I would take the R = system(comfort). But I would seriously consider taking the M with a = lens of 35 mm or less. This would give you the opportunity to take fast = photos in constricted spaces. Also, by having just one lens for the M, = you would be forced to become more comfortable with rf framing and would = learn to make do under the circumstances. This would give you the = experience of the R comfort and the M challenge ;-). Of course if this = did not work out you would have an excuse to try another combination = next year (many wives could not resist another romantic interlude). Regards, Bill Larsen - -----Original Message----- From: Paul T. Collura <pcollura@epix.net> To: Leica <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Date: Tuesday, January 27, 1998 4:28 PM Subject: [Leica] slightly off topic |Fellow LUGgers: | |My wife and I are retracing our honeymoon for our 25th wedding |anniversary in September. We will be traveling to Italy and Germany. = I |want to bring a compact but somewhat complete photo outfit with two |camera bodies to shoot slides and prints and am seeking advice on what |makes a good traveling outfit. I have both M and R equipment but only |one M6 and one R7. Seems to me that it would be better to stick with = one |type of camera system -Reflex or Rangefinder and purchase another body. |I'm leaning toward the reflex system so that I can frame attractions |better in the viewfinder but two R cameras and various lenses are a big |price to pay in weight. Any advice? I want to stay one step above = point |and shoot solutions. | |Thanks in advance, | |Paul T. Collura |