Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/01/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dave: I beleive you responded to a thread regarding the unauthorized re-publication of images published in copyrighted forms. You won't get an agrument from me on your position. Photographers can only hold the copyrights they protect. Tom At 11:08 AM 1/27/98 -0600, you wrote: >> >> <We all have to deal with challenges at work. You could change proffessions. >> Lets talk about Leica. >> >> Dave> > >> Thomas Kachadurian wrote: > >> Dave: >> >> I hope you are kidding. There is not lens or body that will have more >> impact on photographers than the abuse of copyrights. >> >> Tom > >Hey Tom, > >As a camera store/ full-service lab owner my income is impacted every day by the current >copyright laws. My business follows all copyright laws to the letter. Not a day goes by >that someone doesn't leave my store angry about being turned away because the material >was copyrighted. Their frustration is almost always directed at us. I accept this >situation as part of the climate in which I must do business. > >We do try to assist the customer in obtaining a release in an effort to facilitate >solving a customer's problem and to get the job. If the material in question is not >watermarked or stickered but looks like it was professionally done, I am supposed to >turn the work away. Have you seen what an amatuer can do armed with decent film, a >little knowledge, a Canon Rebel, auto fill-flash, good finishing, etc.? The burden of >proof of copyright should fall squarely on the shoulders of those who want/need the >protection, not my counter help. Simply put, many professionals fail to take the time to >do the simple things to protect themselves. > >When the work is clearly marked as copyrighted material, most of the time the copyright >holder is not noted. Who should the customer contact? God forbid including a phone >number or other means of contact. If I were a professional photographer who wanted to be >compensated for the ongoing use of my images, I would do a couple of things. First, I >would make it easy for people to contact me. Second, I would make a release easy to >obtain. Easy - but very worth my while! > >Several times we have contacted professionals on behalf of a customer only find the >professional unwilling to co-operate. If anyone wants to refuse use, its fine with me - >I can stop wasting my time. We have been told " I'll agree verbally but I don't have >time to get you something on my letterhead". WOW! Yes Your Honor, but he said.... > >One photographer felt inconvienenced by my policy and proceeded to direct her students >at the local fine art school to do business elsewhere. > >It is important for me to stress that we never do more than is authorized by the >photographer. > >While I cannot tell you how much money I have lost protecting you guys, suffice to say >its a lot. My company will continue to respect copyrights. I don't feel we are >unqualified to handle anyone's work. Hey professionals, how about a little help? > >No Tom, I'm not kidding. I am in this group to talk about Leica equipment. If we want to >continue talking about the various hardships concerning our jobs, we ought to do it on >the Wrongs and Injustices at Work Users Group, not the LUG. > >Dave > > >