Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/01/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] What the "other guys" are saying about Leicas
From: thibault collin <tc-lnc@u-picardie.fr>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 1998 11:01:40 +0100

You're right Hans,

and this debate about brands is not totally off topic. 
For instence, I just bought from leica a beautifull binocular (around 8000
bucks; in other days, they were build by Wild...). To make photographs with
it, the leica company "gave" me a...Pentax K1000 body. They're telling that
leica bodies are too expensives and not worth for that kind of
photos...Moreover, I've used many cameras (Nikons, Canons the F1s) on leitz
microscopes or leica bodies on any microscopes (Zeiss, Olympus...) and there
was no trouble. I've also seen that people were using the visoflex lenses on
T90 bodies which is a good idea to give a new life to these lenses. I've
also used the "reprovit" lenses with any kind of bellows and bodies with
great results. What is important is the photographs you get! And of course,
leica lenses can help!
Thib
>Sorry, but I get so tired about this sort of debate. Let the other guys do
>their thing, and we do ours. I feel sorry for the poor guy who defends his
>choice of Leica because it is like a HD motorcycle.
>But I know what it feels like standing beside an EOS guy with a 135 Hektor.
>He must think I am using grandpa's camera... Well, I really don't care.
>/Hans
>
>
>
>Some postings to the rec.photo.equipment.35mm newsgroup that may be of
>interest to the list:
>
>
>
>