Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/01/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Test reports on Leica M and Contax G lenses?
From: Lucien_vD <Lucien_vD@compuserve.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 1998 12:29:08 -0500

Lucien_vD@compuserve.com wrote:
> =

> My personal opinion is that the Contax G-series Biogons (21mm & 28mm)
beat
> their Leica counterparts.  The Leica 35mm Aspherics beat the G-series
35mm
> Planar (in my opinion, the weakest of the 5 Zeiss lenses for the G2 I'v=
e
> used)
> hands down but it holds its own with the Leica 35 f/2.0 non-aspheric
model
> (meaning no better, no worse -- both are somewhat soft in the corners
wide
> open).  I'd rather have Leica's 50 f/2.0 than the G-series 45mm Planar =
by
a
> very slim margin but I think that the G-series 90mm f/2.8 Sonnar easily=

> beats
> the 90mm f/2.8 M-series from Leica.

I never wrote that, it was coming from the Contax G list.
My mistake, wrong key cap !

Sorry,

Lucien
BELGIUM