Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/01/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Fellow Luggers, can anybody clear up my doubts? I am sure this has been discussed in the past but not since I am on the list. Sorry, if for some of you this is repetitive. I know that the CLE lenses fit physically. What I would like to know for certain is about exact RF coupling. When I was in Solms the last time I asked this question. The "official" Leica reply was: you can mount the lenses but they will not couple properly with the M RF. It is possible that the difference will be covered up by depth-of-field, but the correct answer is no, they do not couple. Since I now own an M6 body I became curious and made all kinds of combinations. In a (admittedly unscientific) test I mounted the M6 and the CLE bodies side by side on a tripod and kept exchanging the same CLE lens focussing on different subjects at different distances with the RF. After adjusting for exact focus the position of the helical was always the same for the same subject on BOTH bodies. This makes me think of the following possibilities: 1. Leica's "official" answer is correct in a mathematical sense, but the practical differences are imperceptible. 2. Leica misunderstood and was referring to CL lenses instead of CLE lenses. According to "Handbuch des Leica-Systems 1984/4" CL lenses have a "steep curve" helicoid, whereas M lenses have a "differential" helicoid maintaining the follower cam always parallel. Because of this CL lenses can not be focussed correctly via RF on M bodies. This is printed Leica information. CLE lenses have a "plane cam" as Minolta states in the manual, whatever that is. 3. Leica doesn't like to admit, that a competitor's lenses can be used succesfully on an M body. Minolta is something of an ex-wife to Leica now. 4. Leica is plain wrong (unlikely but not impossible). Who knows the answer? Andras Iklody-Szabo Caracas / Venezuela