Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/01/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Fred, I don't pretend to have the expertise that others on the LUG have but I spent a year in Europe and shot a ton of Kodachrome. I had three wide angle lenses. A 24mm Nikkor, a 28mm ElmaritR and a 35mm SummicronM. The 24mm was clearly the most useful lens among the three in the close confines of Europe. I no longer have the 24mm but I've found it to be more useful than the 28mm. The 28mm is kinda like all-weather tires, a Jack of all Trades and Master of None. Just my two cents. Bud Cook - -----Original Message----- From: Fred Whitlock <afc@cl-sys.com> To: Leica List <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Date: Sunday, January 04, 1998 7:41 AM Subject: [Leica] Wide angle lens assortment > >I love wide angle photography but have only 2 wide angle lenses for the M >system-a 21mm Elmarit-M and a 35mm Summicron-M. There are times when I >wish I had something in between. The new 24 Aspherical is very pricey and >perhaps too close to the 21 in focal length. The 28 Elmarit-M has the >advantage of not requiring an accessory viewfinder for the M4-P or M6 but >is, perhaps, a little close in focal length to the 35. I think it's the >better choice for me to add to my kit, at least on the surface. Has any >one else solved a similar dilemma satisfactorily? Has anyone added one of >the intermediate WA's to the lenses I have and been glad they did it? >Should I simply replace the 35 with the 28? The 28 would have to make >blistering images to replace the 35 Summicron for me. I use it more than >any other single lens. Any discussion would be appreciated. Good >shooting. > >Fred >Maplewood Photography >http://www.maplewoodphoto.com > >