Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/12/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]= Henning J. Wulff wrote: >I'm not much >of a 28 user, so I haven't used all the 28's, but I believe the present = 28 >is close to if not better than the first 28/2.8 (non-retrofocus) design.= >With respect to the 21's, the old 21/3.4 SA (non-retrofocus) is still >better than the newest 21/2.8 ASPH, so going to a retrofocus design pure= ly >for better illumination is usually not advisable. I also always found the 21mm SA better than the following retrofocus 21's= =2E But I find the actual retrofocus 28/2,8 much better = than the first non retrofocus (german & canadian) version. Why is that? Lucien BELGIUM