Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/12/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Sun, 21 Dec 1997, Alfred Breull wrote: > 1) Yes, no; 2) (old) metal better than plastic; 3) 4/21 and > 3.4/21 (better); 4) ?; 5) definitely yes. > > Alf > ----------------------------------------------------------- > At 12:31 21.12.1997 -0600, Bud Cook wrote: > >Questions for the experts: > > > >1) Can you use the 21mm Super Angulon on an M6 and also use the meter? > >2) Are any of the 21mm finders better than others, i.e. is there some > >types/versions that should be avoided? > >3) Is there more than one version of the 21mm SA, i.e. before and after the > >M5? > >4) What should a mint 21mm SA cost in the U.S.? > >5) Is it worth paying more for an SA than an early version of the 21mm > >Elmarit assuming both are perfect examples? > > May I disagree with one observation? I had the older metal 21mm finder and nor have the black plastic one. I find the more recent plastic one to be better as the eye-relief is better suited for people wo wear glasses. I can easily see the entire field with it and I cannot with the metal one, when I wear my glasses (and I always do). Please check this out, if you wear glasses. Ed