Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/12/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 05:31 PM 12/18/97 -0800, Jacques Bilinski wrote: > > If the people at the Brooks institute think otherwise it is >because they are wrong. Focusing beyond infinity just means that the plane >of focus is ahead of the film plane. Farsighted people routinely focus >beyond infinity when they are not wearing glasses. There is nothing >mystical about focusing beyond infinity. > Jacques, I do not agree. And I have been doing it for a very long time. And I have tested infinity focus, beyond infinity focus. And backing away from the infinity stop on WA & MWA lenses puts the maximum in focus information ON THE FILM, instead of in front of it. Your statement makes no sense at all. Did you actually read anything that was said? Logic would say that (in your words) "Focusing beyond infinity just means that the plane of focus is ahead of the film plane" would render the FILM PLANE OUT OF FOCUS. Not exactly what we are after here. We are looking for MAXIMUM focus and dof AT THE FILM PLANE. Not somewhere else. <<<>There is nothing >mystical about focusing beyond infinity.>>> What does this mean? Did anyone mention anything unintelligible? Who, other than Hawking, would want to SET their focus beyond infinity. Talk about being back focused! Talk about blurry photographs. Whew! Being able to focus your long lens beyond infinity simply allows you, a human, to yo-yo-in the focus on that far far away object (such as the moon) and get it in critically sharp focus on the film plane. A very very simple concept. But I am not going to argue with you. I know what works, and I simply shared it with the LUG. If there is something you have tried, that really works, and allows you to make sharper photographs, please share it with the LUG. But the proof of the pudding is in the tasting. I urge you not to make wild accusations about something unless you have personally exhaustively tested the theories. And have ended up with pudding that tastes good. Jim