Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/12/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In addition to an M and and R outfit I also a fairly large collection of Pentax lens of both screw and K - mount vintages. Some of the Pentax lenses measure quite a bit better on resolution charts and at infinity than do the Leica lens, with the exception of the 2.8 Elmarit series (35, 60, 90, 135) for the R. However color and black and photos have more depth and interest in them with the Leica lens. I lived through most of the "transistion" from the primary concern with resolution to contrast (thus the MTF method of lens evaluation which I think Leica pioneered was developed). I do know that finer details show up with Tech Pan with some of the Pentax lenses and I use them if that is the goal of the exercise. However, if overall picture quality is the aim, then the Leica lenses are the obvious choice. The color v. BW issue arose in the marketplace, I think, with the rapid rise of color print film and the widespread ease of processing that material. Resolution is not really a great concern with color negative film and papers as normally processed, contrast certainly is, IMO. Of course the issue is not that simple, but the ability of the media to reproduce fine detail could be of interest. Certainly slides as projected have benefited drammatically in color rendition and shadow detail with the advent of the newer lens formulations.