Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/12/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]If this is off-topic, I beg the list's indulgence. Over the holiday, my dad and I were comparing notes and photos. He still uses a Retina IIIc (small) sometimes, and a Canon SLR (T50) but his eyesight isn't what it used to be and he has trouble focusing. He's got a couple of the AF P&S types but hasn't been real thrilled with them either. He fooled around with my M3 and it was better but still more effort for him to focus than he would have liked. Question: given the standard of reference as an M3, would anybody care to take a stab as to how the Contax G1 compares in usability and "feel"? My understanding is that the glass is supposed to be good, but that the G2 is a large improvement in the VF and AF areas. I doubt my dad would go "wider" than 28mm anad the G1 seems to be somewhat discounted right now. Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated. I'd like to help him out (after all, he gave me the Canon RFs that got me started!) He lives in a small town where simply going to the local pro shop isn't an option, so if the G1 isn't a great idea, I can save him the effort of a wild goose chase. Bill