Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/11/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I am a model photographer looking for the ultimate in image quality. I currently own a Nikon F5 and assorted f/2.8 to f/1.4 Nikkor fixed lenses, from 20mm to 180mm. I shoot female models in swimwear, lingerie and nudes, mostly with my 35, 50, and 85 lenses. I hardly touch my 20 and 180. I am not disappointed with the Nikkor glass quality, but I am impressed with the distinct look and feel of Leica portraits when compared to Nikon or Canon on a light box. I want that superior sharpness and color accuracy in MY images, and for that reason only, I am selling my entire Nikon system for a Leica system. I have discovered that superior lens quality is MUCH more important to creating striking images than a fully electronic body. I am seriously considering the M6 with the 35 f/1.4 ASPH and the 90 f/2 as my first M lenses. Yes, I considered the R8, but then I thought: I almost never go over 135mm, I want to get away from full automation, I hate using strobe, I prefer ambient light outdoors, I want to challenge myself technically in order to better my photography, I don't want to worry about batteries anymore, and I want the best image quality available. I drifted to the M6 immediately after testing it in a local shop. The silence, portability, and obvious mechanical perfection amazed me, and I want to be a part of this Leica family. My questions are as follows: 1. Is the M6 the right choice for me, now that you know a bit about my shooting style, or shall I consider the R8 a bit more carefully? 2. Are there differences in quality between the M lenses and the R lenses? I have been told that the M lenses are slightly better. 3. Is Leitz glass truly "Number One?" What about Contax G2 and Carl Zeiss optics? Do they compete, quality-wise? Shall I consider them? 4. Which M lenses are the ABSOLUTE best (regardless of price) when it comes to sharpness and color-accuracy? Is a 35 and a 90 a perfect starter kit, or should I consider the other fast lenses like the 24 ASPH, the 50 NOCT, and the 75 1.4? Remember, I am making this serious professional decision for only one reason..... to get better quality slides for enlargement and digital scanning. I need FAST lenses (so I don't have to use strobe) that are super-sharp wide open and all the way down with no vignetting or aberration.....they must also be the best in color accuracy, with no color casting. Which M lenses fit the bill? Are R lenses better? 5. Is there a reason to choose between black, chrome, and titanium, other than an aesthetic one? Is the titanium more sturdy and element-proof? Will it hold its value more than the others? 6. Sometimes I shoot in inclement weather or along the seashore with my F5, worry-free. Can I expect the same level of durability against mist and salt from the M6 or R8? Thanks so much for your help, ladies and gentlemen. I hope you will welcome my comments and questions on this list, as I will be making this purchase in the next 2 days and will be asking many questions as I adjust to the new system. Thanks again....please email directy to fls@home.com if you can answer today or tomorrow, since I need advice immediately and the next list may not be out by then.