Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/11/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: 135/1:2.8 R You've all talked me into it.
From: Gabe Sachs <egabe@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 19:45:55 +0000

I've got a back up R4s and I'm looking for a lens for it.  Now after I've
seen these 135 f2.8 posts...I'm talked into it.  I'm on the search now.
Thanks
Gabe

At 06:29 PM 11/17/97 -0800, you wrote:
>At 05:48 PM 11/17/97 +0000, Michiel Fokkema wrote:
>>Dear LUG,
>>
>>I noticed that the 135/1:2.8 R is quite an affordable lens.
>>Is this becasue this lens is not up to leica standards anymore, or 
>>just because it is an impopular design?
>
>I have a middle-aged 135/2.8 Elmarit-R -- 3 cams, but old enough to take
>series filters.  It's an excellent performer -- very sharp, nice and
>contrasty.  Some of my favorite pictures of people were taken with it, and
>I've also used it for a lot of macro work (on a bellows) and closeup work
>(with an Elpro).
>
>I think the reason it's cheap is the same reason the 50/2 Summicron-R is
>cheap: it's very, very common.
>
>
>
>