Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/11/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Pix Manipulations (was: Bombay ...) Moss
From: Alfred Breull <puma@hannover.sgh-net.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 15:38:21 +0100

Marvin,

Are you sure, that it justifies to manipulate data in clinical trials (e.g.
drugs in cancer, aids, or heart disease management), just because I do it
for living (also)?

Alf

- -------------------------------------------------------------------
At 05:05 13.11.1997 -0500, you wrote:
>In a message dated 97-11-13 04:50:48 EST, you write:
><< 
> Once there was a time when photographers were proud to show the negative
> borders in their prints also, just to indicate, that the pic was actually
> intended the way it shows...
>  >>=================================================
> Alf - there is a difference between a photo-journalist that is doing 
> bread-butter photography* to earn a living and the artist that does
> art for arts sake and doesn't care a hoot if his work sells or not.
> 
> Marvin   
>
>"There is more to a woman's bosom than what meet the eye"
> * no offense to those that actually receive money for their art.
>