Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/11/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 08:57 PM, you wrote: > LUGs> > > I read Tom Abrahamsson's article on the 24/2.8 ASPH lens in the recent> > LHSA's Viewfinder. He mentioned that the above lens does not have a> > "signature" like the 21/3.4 or the 50/2 DR.> > > I would like to know what makes a lens qualify to be called a "signature"> > lens?> Imagination? :-) ========== Eric Welch St. Joseph, MO http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch Is reading in the bathroom considered Multi-Tasking?