Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/11/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: "Signature" Lens
From: Eric Welch <>
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 1997 12:57:22 -0600

At 08:57 PM, you wrote: 
> LUGs>
> I read Tom Abrahamsson's article on the 24/2.8 ASPH lens in the recent>
> LHSA's Viewfinder.  He mentioned that the above lens does not have a>
> "signature" like the 21/3.4 or the 50/2 DR.>
> I would like to know what makes a lens qualify to be called a "signature">
> lens?>

Imagination? :-)

Eric Welch
St. Joseph, MO

Is reading in the bathroom considered Multi-Tasking?