Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/10/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 07:38 PM 10/24/97 +0000, Danny Gonzales wrote: >There does seem to be an absolute co-relation between rarity and market value. If this is >not so, I'd appreciate some examples. Oh, horse patooties, Danny. The camera world is full of rare and not-so-valuable items. The auxiliary lenses for the Super Paxettes and Werras are exceedingly hard to find but aren't worth diddly when you do find them, as there is virtually no demand. I have two Carl Zeiss Jena LTM lenses. Both are rare, and only two examples are known to exist of each. One is a 1.5/7.5cm Biotar T: I've been offered two grand for it. I could auction this baby off at Christie's or Tamarkin's and possibly make quite a bit more, as there is demand for this jewel. The other is a 4/13.5cm Triotar. I paid $200 for it and that's what the guy I bought it from paid for it. That's all its worth: I can sell it for $200, as I know the few collectors of oddball CZJ lenses in LTM. But this is NOT a collector's prize as is the Biotar. Marc Marc James Small Cha Robh Bas Fir, Gun Ghras Fir! FAX: +540/343-7315