Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/10/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Visoflex / Jim / Marvin
From: Jim Brick <jim@brick.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 17:17:37 -0700

At 07:50 PM 10/17/97 -0400, you wrote:
>After reading a post here about the horrific denegration of the Leica CL on
>Usenet, I decided to do a test; I posted a simple question on rec.35mm:
>What is the general opinion of the Leica CL?
>
>Upshot is that Usenet is no different than the LUG. There were no truly
>irresponsible replies and the overall opinion of the camera is exactly
>identical between the dreaded Usenet and the cognitivly dissonant LUG.
>
>Only one post delivered poor info (a man spoke of the CL as lacking in
>currently available repairability) and so, especially considering this
>weeks LUG-hell, it seems that  there really is little difference between
>venues.
>
>Danny Gonzalez

As many know, I'm in the market for a CL. I'm not sure what the
"cognitively dissonant LUG"nuts think of the CL. Probably that it's not a
Leica. That aside, my opinion is that it's a fine RF camera with meter.
Anyone have or know of a good CL for sale?

Jim


*****************************************
* Looking for a CL s/n 139... or higher *
*****************************************