Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/10/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 07:50 PM 10/17/97 -0400, you wrote: >After reading a post here about the horrific denegration of the Leica CL on >Usenet, I decided to do a test; I posted a simple question on rec.35mm: >What is the general opinion of the Leica CL? > >Upshot is that Usenet is no different than the LUG. There were no truly >irresponsible replies and the overall opinion of the camera is exactly >identical between the dreaded Usenet and the cognitivly dissonant LUG. > >Only one post delivered poor info (a man spoke of the CL as lacking in >currently available repairability) and so, especially considering this >weeks LUG-hell, it seems that there really is little difference between >venues. > >Danny Gonzalez As many know, I'm in the market for a CL. I'm not sure what the "cognitively dissonant LUG"nuts think of the CL. Probably that it's not a Leica. That aside, my opinion is that it's a fine RF camera with meter. Anyone have or know of a good CL for sale? Jim ***************************************** * Looking for a CL s/n 139... or higher * *****************************************