Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/10/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Alf wrote: >Of course, I know that the 2/90 or 100 mm Macro are nice lenses, = >but that's true for the 2.5/ 105 also. David wrote: >I bought a 105/2.5 AIS to try to see if what you said was really true = >as some people like you had said so far. It has been nothing but = >disappointments. Simply it has not come up with any of my R or M = >lenses. If you fell in love with the Nikon, would you buy this lens = >from me? I do exactly the same with a 105/2,5 AI (the former one) and I discover that the "mystic" about that lens is just that: a legend. Nothing to compare with a 90/2 R or 90/2,8 or 100/2,8 Apo. The images are flat! (BTW I've already sell it) Lucien BELGIUM