Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/10/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Leica-Users List Digest V1 #687
From: "Jacques Bilinski" <jbilin@axionet.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 19:48:46 -0700

> >This last point is debateable.  I have seen several comparisons of the
F5's
> >metering with the R8, and they find that the differences, if any, are in
> >the R8's favour.  I'm talking about real world picture taking tests, not
> >laboratory tests.
> 
> In fact (if you don't mind my replying to my own post), I have been known
> to load up my Minolta 9xi with chrome film, set the camera to Programmed
> automation using matrix metering, and shoot willy nilly, letting the
camera
> do all the decisions for me.  In all the times I have done this, I can't
> recall ONE poorly exposed frame.  Virtually 100% successfull.  How can
> either the F5 or R8 beat that?
> 

Theoretically at least an an autofocus camera with multiple autofocus
sensors should have the edge because the microprocessor 'knows' which
metering segments are in focus.