Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/09/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: 100/4 Elmar vs 65/3.5 Elmar
From: ABreull@aol.com
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 03:54:59 -0400 (EDT)

In einer eMail vom 08.09.1997  05:58:28, schreiben Sie:

>At 04:40 PM 9/7/97 -0400, you wrote:
>> Patrick -
>>      In the past, I have used the 65/3.5 Elmar with adapter on the "R"
>> Bellows, with excellent results but am getting rid of all my "R" equip-
>> ment and will use the 65 on both the "M" Bellows & directly on the
>> Visoflex with the OTZFO universal focusing mount.  I use the the 65
>> in preference to the 100 (even though it is a preset) since all other
>> things being equal, I find it more versatile in that it will focus from
>> infinity to same size (l:l) with the same superb results.
>
>I've heard very good things about that lens, and I even bid $400 for one on
>AuctionWeb a month or so ago.  However, I was outbid on the last day by
>that canny collector, Marvin Moss!  The 65/3.5 is an expensive lens,
>though, by comparison with the 100/4, which usually sells for about $350 in
>its bellows version.  Still maybe one of these days I'll get one.
>
>-Patrick

Just for iinformation: The f 3.5/ 65 mm Elmar is evidently far more expensive
here (Germany) ... saw one recently on DM 1.150 (ca $ 640).

Alf