Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/09/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>They are utterly unjustified. Twenty-six cameras (out of how >many made by Leica?) over eleven years of production, or six cameras >over two years, do not constitute a statistically significant >sample. No conclusions about overall failure rates of Leicas can >reliably be drawn from so small a basis. Please stop trying. If >you want to make claims based on statistics, get meaningful ones -- >survey thousands of owners, or try to get the facts on repair rates >from Leica service. > Eric, Unfortunately only so much owners participated. Yes, the results are not conclusive ! but still, for such a small group of people being survey, the failure rates of the M cameras are high compared to other cameras. And even myself was unfortunate to receive a new chrome M6, only to find out upon opening a back, a piece of metal fell off which was part of the frame counter. But still, I went ahead and bought one because I really liked the lenses. And yes I have stopped doing the survey since I myself found out that the camera does have some quality control problems unfortunately ! I have bought several cameras over the years & sad to say, this is the first time I bought a camera this expensive that failed me on the 1st day it arrived @ my doorsteps ! But that did not stop me from purchasing one and beforehand the survey clearly illustrated that there is a chance, maybe not 50% of getting one, of getting a problematic one, and indeed I got it ! Regards Ferdinand