Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/07/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Group, I recently bought a mint SL recently on which to mount a 135/2.8, a focal length I get no satisfaction using on my M bodies. I absolutely love this camera - reminds me of the best of the best from my teenage years as a tyro (wishing I could own this instead of my Spotmatic). One thing I'm looking forward to is using my Hasselblad lenses on this body with one of those Zorkendorfer mounts (even shifts!). Wow, is this Heaven or what? Curt Chris wrote: >In my opinion, Richard should have explained to his wife that the SL is a >real classic that will probably never wear out. Besides it is a good >investment. Today's electronic cameras may not have spares available in just >a few years. Did we not hear some complaints about the Minolta CLE? > >IMHO, the SL is a great deal. The SL2 is better, but you have to look harder >to find one and pay much more money. On the other hand, the SL2 is a little >more compatible with the later R cameras. In terms of viewfinder performance >and light-meter sensitivity, the SL2 compares very well with the new R8. Elizabeth Mei Wong Birding with Berkshire County's Hoffman Bird Club or Women Outdoors at http://members.aol.com/womenout/index.htm Henry Curtis Miller, M.P.A. Pittsfield, Massachusetts In the Berkshires, next door to Tanglewood