Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/06/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]User Surachai V. at UNESCAP4 is not defined Original text follows ---------------------------------------------- Received: from gatekeeper5.un.org by mail-in2.un.org (SMTPLINK V2.11.01) ; Thu, 12 Jun 97 05:53:40 EST Return-Path: <owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Received: by gatekeeper5.un.org; id AA048018602; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 05:43:22 -0400 Received: from mejac.palo-alto.ca.us(192.147.236.1) by gatekeeper5.un.org via smap (V3.1) id xma004593; Thu, 12 Jun 97 05:34:51 -0400 Received: by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us id AA07382; Thu, 12 Jun 97 01:10:52 -0700 Received: by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us id AA07376; Thu, 12 Jun 97 01:10:44 -0700 Received: from hp24.lrz-muenchen.de by sunsrv5.lrz-muenchen.de; Thu, 12 Jun 97 10:10:27 +0200 Received: by hp24.lrz-muenchen.de (1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA039253027; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 10:10:27 +0200 Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 10:10:26 +0200 (METDST) From: Rainer Mueller <uh3b207@hpmail.lrz-muenchen.de> X-Sender: uh3b207@hp24.lrz-muenchen.de To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: Noncoated filter In-Reply-To: <199706120543.WAA29261@axionet.com> Message-Id: <Pine.HPP.3.91.970612100820.3902A-100000@hp24.lrz-muenchen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Precedence: bulk Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Hello, to save the reputation of the Hama company: I just come from the dealer again, and he told me that the filter is coated, but not multicoated. He said that it would not make much of a difference to take the multicoated version, because a polarization filter anyway absorbs at least half of the light. What do you think? Regards, Rainer