Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/05/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]seungmin@luxmail.luxcom.com wrote: > > Hi, > > How would you compare R6 or R6.2 with Leicaflex SL or sL2? > > Regards, > David > I can only speak for the SL2, which: *is heavier than R7/6.2 *has no MLU capability *has no motor drive capacity (unless you opt for the SL2 Mot!) *has a pretty good averaging meter, but no spot as in 6, 6.2, 7 *offers 1-1/2000s shutter speeds Mine is still accurate with respect to shutter speeds, even at 2000. Think seriously about the lack of MLU, which is great for close-up work. I travel with the SL2 & use it for my second film type, but rely on the R7 for 80% of my shots. Good luck & have fun deciding! cdh