Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/05/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Roger Beamon wrote: I've long argued that this type of discussion is photographic > mental masturbation. Your reference to a "Dominatrix" (gasp!) would > seem to make my case. [Would you tell me about her in a private > email? 8^) ] Roger, For me, this has been the most meaningful type of discussion. Most of the tech stuff about Leica is a delete. I spent years making a living as a writer and studied grammar (though perhaps you wouldn't know it from my posts!), but grammar (and typewriters) weren't things we discussed among writers. And the in book about Magnum, In Our Time, the author talks about discussions among the photographers that almost never involved "photography." These are not easy things to discuss. But I support you playing with your toys anyway you want, Roger! As for the Dominatrix, maybe Oddmund would be willing to pay and you could be taught a lesson or two about humility and acceptance of other people's ideas. We could then turn the tables and hang Oddmund up by his thumbs (I'm sure you wouldn't mind paying her fee). Of course, we might find out he likes the pain!! In truth, the Dominatrix was photographed in the studio with a Pentax 6x7, and thus no worthy subject for our venerable Leica board. However, I am working on a web site..... Donal Philby San Diego