Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/05/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I believe it's already been mentioned here, but I just got ahold of the May/June '97 issue of Photo Techniques and found the set of articles regarding "bokeh" to be fascinating: Much of it confirms what some have been stating here, but the article goes further, by providing specific examples to show the effects, as well as delving into the lens design considerations that affect bokeh. Definitely a must-have for Leica fans follwing the "Leica Glow" ("Minolta Glow"?) threads, as well as those wondering what the heck is going on. Probably the first mention I heard of such phenomena in the US were some postings a few years back by Mike Johnson, who, at the time, was characterizing lenses as "wire sharp" and "smooth sharp". This vocabulary partially helped me to explain why a '60s 80 f/2.8 Planar on my Rolleiflex SL-66, while not striking me as having the vivid sense of contrast and sharpness as some of my Nikkors, did strike me as having a smooth consistency which I found pleasing in the many macro shots I did with the outfit. But this beginning vocabulary didn't begin to figure in particular qualities of the out-of-focus portions of an image, much less provide any easy means of expressing what I saw (or thought I did) there. Me, I was vexed by the question of how a lens could seem to deliver adequate sharpness, yet, not quite deliver results as I had envisioned under certain conditions, such as shooting a sunlight canopy of leaves from below, or a forest floor, in which a few leaves might be brightly lit from breaks in the canopy. Best I was able to put into words was an effect in which highlights would appear as featureless blobs when using certain optics, though the actual contrast range should've been well within the film's capabilities--but this too, was obviously only describing one particular anomaly. The $4.50 cost of the magazine is reasonable, as it's not everyday that one gets a whole new vocabulary and means of understanding another aspect of the craft for the price of a modest lunch! Hope all the issues are as good-awfully thin, but much better-than average content, I thought. Jeff