Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/04/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thank you very much. I hope sometime I can return the educational favor. M. Berkley, Esq. - ---------- > From: Charles E. Dunlap <cdunlap@rupture.ucsc.edu> > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: Lens Variability > Date: Monday, April 07, 1997 3:49 PM > > >It might be helpful to us if you would elaborate on exactly how you made > >the determination that the lens coating was flawed. > >Also, if the flaws were not glaring, did it take much convincing of the > >people at BandH to see the defects? > >Thanks. > >Mark Berkley > > I looked at the lens! In normal room light I turned the lens (front and > rear elements) so that the light caught the color of the coating. I scanned > across the surface of the lens and found spots where it looked like a > bubble had formed and then burst. There may never have been an actual > bubble there, but that's what it looked like. In other cases I saw places > where specks seemed to be missing coating, as if it had flaked off. Both of > these defects were apparent by the lack of color: they looked like small > mirrored spots. > > Optically I'm not sure that the front element spots would have caused > problems in most shots. The rear element defects worried me more. But even > if they wouldn't produce noticeable deterioration of the final image, they > leave me wondering whether the coating will be durable, whether it was > applied correctly. In a lens that expensive I expect that the functional > elements of the designe be in perfect order. I'm not as enamored of the > exquisite engraving of the distance scale and such things that collectors > prize, but lens coatings are fundamental the performance of the lens. > > B+H had no qualms about accepting the two returns. I sent them back > promptly, explained the problem, and requested an exchange. B+H has always > been fair to me. I have no idea, however, whether they returned the two > imperfect lenses to Leica or sold them to someone else. I suspect the > latter since the lenses did pass Leica quality control. Perhaps they will > work just fine, but the three bad areas that I found on each lens nagged at > me. > > -Charlie > > -------------------------------------------- > Charles E. Dunlap > Earth Sciences Deptartment > University of California > Santa Cruz, CA 95064 > Tel.: (408) 459-5228 Fax.: (408) 459-3074 > -------------------------------------------- >