Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/03/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Charles E. Dunlap wrote: > > >There is currently a commit that appears ~5:30 am est. I was wondering if > >anyone here has ever done this. I have a celestron telescope, and I want to > >attach my nikon 2020 to it. Yeah yeah..not Leica..but still photog. How much > >does this adapter(s) cost. Also in general, what is a good rule of thumb > >for exposure, film speed, etc. Thanks, Hal > > Another option is to get a bracket to mount the camera (you could use the > Leica) onto the telescope. Get the comet head at one side of the field of > view in the camera and put a Barlow on the Celestron. Pick a guide star > through the telescope and keep it near the cross hairs during the exposure > on the camera. This will keep the stars as points of light in the picture > rather than streaks. > > The reason to use a camera (50mm lens works well) is to get the comet's > tail in the frame. Hale-Bopp has a very long tail. My 50mm photos of the > last comet (Hakutake) were much more dramatic and interesting than the ones > shot with a longer lens, much less the telescope. Much of the tail isn't > visible (at least in city light) but will show up on film. > > Some people like to track on the comet's head rather than a guide star. The > stars will appear as streaks, but some people think they get more detail in > the comet's head. The comet's head looks like a blur to me; I prefer > pinpoint stars. > > Good luck. > > -Charlie charlie, what film do you rec. for col. & b&w? sblutter