Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/02/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Colleen asks, > 1) What's your opinion of using Leica, versus collecting? I use it. But since my M4 is in such clean condition, I am overly careful with it. That's why I also use a beat up M3 to take hiking, cycling, xc skiing, etc. >Am I correct to assume my Leica equipment will 'depreciate', if the >use shows, and on the other hand it will 'appreciate' if held and >not used? That is certainly true. > 2) Why do prices of used Leica drop astronomically if there is a tiny mark > or two on the equipment? It seems it should be more important to a buyer > that a piece of equipment functions--ie the body has been used regularly or > recently gone over by Leica technicians. Prices seem to be determined by the collector market rather than the users. I suspect there are far more collectors of Leica than regular users. > 3) Is a photographer crazy to sell Leica equip they love but doesn't meet > needs--cost versus return--of a 9-5 photography business? Not if you can afford to keep it. There are lots of things I would love to own but I can't afford them. The Leicas I use and can therefore justify owning them. > 4) How do I figure out how much equip is worth, should I actually sell it? Check the ads in Shutterbug. > 5) Background you can ignore: > Leica I use: M4--with a ding on top that was there 15 years ago when I > bought it and has functioned well--dedicated to a 21/3.4 lens; It's hard to imagine the dented M4 depreciating much further with normal use. an M4P used > 5 years, gets least use and in best condition of the three bodies I own; Sell it! > M6--I use the most; > 35/1.4 canadian; 50/2 chrome wetzler; 90/2.8 elmarit. > > I do use Leica becasue it feels nice in hand, it's quiet, compact and takes > sharp photos. > I don't use Leica because I can't do macro and telephoto work as > efficiently as the Nikon the macro 55, and the 180/2.8--and because I > really like the Nikon 85/1.4; and because I don't want to devalue the > Leica. Do you use the Nikon 85/1.4 because of it's maximum aperture or the larger image in the viewfinder? How often do you use f 1.4 or f 2? I rarely shoot wide open. Peter Jon White